EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy Droit et Politique de l'Immigration et de l'Asile de l'UE

Print this article

Par Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz 

Les frontières représentent des lieux symboliquement forts qui sont profondément ancrées dans notre héritage culturel. La plupart d’entre nous avons pris connaissance de l’existence des frontières à l’école en tant que traits noirs séparant des pays sur une carte. Elles apparaissaient ainsi comme des structures presque naturelles nous permettant de nous orienter. Par conséquent, ce n’est pas une surprise si dans le débat politique les frontières nationales sont souvent invoquées comme un rempart à la crise de l’asile que nous connaissons. La Suède a récemment intensifié les contrôles en renforçant les sanctions à l’encontre des transporteurs. La semaine dernière, l’Autriche a introduit un plafond au nombre de demandes d’asiles et, pendant ce temps-là, en Allemagne, le soutien à un potentiel Plan B gagne de l’importance. Continue reading »

Print this article

By Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz 

Borders are a place of great symbolic importance and are deeply enshrined in our cultural memory. Most of us first encountered them in school where we got to know borders as fine black lines on maps separating countries. They appeared, thus, as a quasi-natural basic structure giving us orientation. It does not come as a surprise, therefore, that political debates often invoke national borders as a place where a solution to the ongoing refugee crisis could be found. Sweden recently stepped up controls through reinforced carrier sanctions. Last week, Austria introduced an upper limit on the number of refugees, while support for a potential Plan B gathered momentum in Germany. Continue reading »

Print this article

At a time when the debate on solidarity in the EU is blocked due to the failure of the relocation system proposed by the European Commission, we are happy to publish an article by economist Hillel Rapoport, which demonstrates an alternative to the present system. We hope that this article can serve to re-open the debate on the different possibilities for responsibility-sharing in the EU.

The article originally appeared in French on LeMonde.fr. We thank Le Monde for their authorisation to publish the English translation on this blog.

by Hillel Rapoport, Paris School of Economics and Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute 

The tragedies of the past summer have shaken public opinion and caused a radical change in the positions of European leaders, who increasingly rallied to the idea of refugee admission quotas. On the quantitative side, it is not for economists to say whether to integrate 40, 160 or 800,000 refugees. This is a political decision which must be based on humanitarian considerations and an assessment of the respective societies’ capacity (both socio-cultural and economic) to absorb refugees. However, on these two issues, economic analysis can help improve the European Unions’ response to the migrant crisis.

My colleague Jesus Fernandez-Huertas Moraga (University of Madrid) and I proposed a system of refugee admissions quotas within the European Union that are both “tradable” and accompanied by a “matching” mechanism. These tools have several advantages: they would lower the anticipated costs for the host country, and would therefore increase the likelihood that states would vote in favour of the amended system; they would take into account the preferences of both refugees (in terms of destination) and the host country (regarding the profile of the refugees they wish to host) as far as possible; and they would counter the race to the bottom on humanitarian protection. Continue reading »

Print this article

by Paula García Andrade, Universidad Pontificia Comillas 

The current refugee crisis the EU is experiencing has created quite a few divisions and disagreements among EU Member States and also among EU institutions. Discord does not however seem to focus only on the substance, but it has also reached the form. In recent months, a certain confusion has arisen with regard to the responsibility to convene and lead talks with third countries aimed at finding effective responses to the challenges posed to the EU by the constant arrival of people seeking international protection. Continue reading »

Print this article

This article is a collaboration between the European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) and the Odysseus Academic Network in honour of ECLAN’s 10th Anniversary. ECLAN will celebrate its anniversary with a conference in Spring 2016.

Co-authored by Anne Weyembergh and Chloé Brière, ECLAN  

Henri Labayle, GDR-ELSJ  

Philippe De Bruycker, Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute  

and David Watt, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project 

In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday 13th November, the French President declared a state of emergency and announced the introduction of a number of measures to “mobilise all possible forces in order to neutralise the terrorists and to guarantee the security of all the areas which could be concerned”. These measures included the reintroduction of controls by France at its internal borders with other Schengen States in the interest of preventing both the entry into the territory of dangerous individuals seeking to carry out terrorist attacks, and to thwart the escape of the attackers.

Nonetheless, Salah Abdeslam, a suspect believed to be one of the masterminds of the attacks, managed to escape by crossing the border between France and Belgium during the night from Friday to Saturday without being apprehended and has still not been arrested since, despite significant effort on the part of the Belgian and French police forces. More surprising, although relatively ignored by the media is that he was checked by French police in the border region (around the city of Cambrai) but not apprehended. How can this have happened in the heart of the EU where border guards, police, judges and intelligence services use modern technology to trace such people? Continue reading »

Print this article

Cet article est le fruit d’une collaboration entre ECLAN (European Criminal law Academic Network) et Odysseus Academic Network en l’honneur du 10ème anniversaire d’ECLAN. ECLAN célébrera son anniversaire par une conférence au printemps 2016.

Co-rédigé par Anne Weyembergh et Chloé Brière, ECLAN 
Henri Labayle, GDR-ELSJ 
Philippe de Bruycker, Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute 
et David Watt, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project 

Directement après les attaques terroristes du 13 novembre à Paris, le Président français a déclaré l’état d’urgence et a annoncé l’introduction de mesures visant à « mobiliser toutes les forces possibles afin de neutraliser les terroristes et de garantir la sécurité de tous les lieux qui pourraient être visés ». Parmi ces mesures se trouve la réintroduction des contrôles aux frontières avec les autres États de l’espace Schengen dans le but de prévenir l’entrée sur le territoire d’individus dangereux qui cherchent à commettre des attaques terroristes ainsi que d’empêcher les assaillants de fuir.

Néanmoins, Salah Abdeslam, le cerveau présumé des attaques, a réussi à s’enfuir en traversant la frontière entre la France et la Belgique dans la nuit du vendredi au samedi sans être appréhendé, et il n’a toujours pas été arrêté depuis, malgré les importants moyens déployés par les forces de police belges et françaises. Plus surprenant, bien que relativement ignoré par les médias, est le fait qu’il ait été contrôlé par la police française dans la région frontalière (près de la ville de Cambrai) sans être arrêté. Comment cela a-t-il pu se produire au cœur de l’UE où les garde-frontières, la police, les juges et les services de renseignement aidés par des moyens technologiques modernes suivent en permanence de tels individus ? Continue reading »