March 2017

Ill-Treatment Of Migrants In Greek Law Enforcement – Are the Strasbourg Court Judgments the Tip of the Iceberg?by Nikolaos Sitaropoulos, Office of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights

Petit à petit la vulnérabilité fait son nid … Quelques réflexions à propos de l’arrêt C.K. du 16 février 2017 – par Joanna Pétin, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)  

EU-Swiss free movement and “stop mass immigration”: Much Ado about Nothing? – by Francesco Maiani, Associate Professor at the University of Lausanne, and Véronique Boillet, Assistant Professor at the University of Lausanne

Libre circulation Suisse-UE et « stop à l’immigration de masse » : Much Ado about Nothing ?par Francesco Maiani, Professeur associé à l’Université de Lausanne et Véronique Boillet, Professeure assistante à l’Université de Lausanne

Corrective allocation or effective solidarity? The Slovak Presidency non-paper on the revision of the Dublin system – by Maarten den Heijer, Assistant Professor of International Law, University of Amsterdam

Odysseus Annual Conference 2017 “Beyond ‘Crisis’? The State of Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in the EU” – An Overview – by Gabriel Almeida, Katharina Bamberg and James Kneale, OMNIA Coordination Team, Odysseus Network

Escale à Canossa ? La protection des droits fondamentaux lors d’un transfert « Dublin » vue par la Cour de justice (C.K. c. Slovénie, C-578/16 PPU) – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

February 2017

Le visa humanitaire et la jouissance effective de l’essentiel des droits : une voie moyenne? À propos de l’affaire X. et X par Jean-Yves Carlier et Luc Leboeuf, Université Catholique de Louvain

The X. and X. case: Humanitarian visas and the genuine enjoyment of the substance of rights, towards a middle way?by Jean-Yves Carlier and Luc Leboeuf, Université Catholique de Louvain

Asylum Visas as an Obligation under EU Law: Case PPU C-638/16 X, X v État Belge (Part II)by Dr Violeta Moreno-Lax, Queen Mary University of London

Le non-refoulement comme principe du droit international et le rôle des tribunaux dans sa mise en oeuvre – par Bruno Nascimbene, Université de Milan

Asylum Visas as an Obligation under EU Law: Case PPU C-638/16 X, X v État Belge (Part I)by Dr Violeta Moreno-Lax, Queen Mary University of London

Terrorisme et droit des réfugiés, des liaisons dangereuses ? Libres propos sur le « Muslim Ban » et la jurisprudence Lounani de la Cour de Justice  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

Pitfalls of the Law, Politics and Administrative Practices in the Reform of the Common European Asylum Systemby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

Judicial scrutiny of return detention in the Member States: the contribution of national courts to clarifying the concept of ‘risk of absconding’ – by Dr Madalina Bianca Moraru, Centre for Judicial Cooperation, European University Institute

January 2017

The EU Migration Partnership Framework: an External Solution to the Crisis? – by Céline Bauloz, Refugee Law Initiative, School of Advanced Study, University of London

Hotspots and EU Agencies: Towards an integrated European administration? – by Dr Lilian Tsourdi, European University Institute

A Happy New Year for Migration and Asylum Policy? A Critical Review of the Legal and Policy Developments in 2016 in Relation to the Crisis of the European Union – by Philippe de Bruycker, Odysseus Network

December 2016

Europe’s asylum policy in crisis: the case of Belgium – by Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen (Flemish Refugee Action)

November 2016

The UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants: a mirror of the current EU Migration Policy?by Gabriel Almeida & Katharina Bamberg, OMNIA Coordination Team, Odysseus Network

La modification discrète du Code Frontières Schengen par le règlement 2016/1624 relatif au corps européen de garde-frontières: comblement d’une lacune ? – par Nuno Piçarra, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & European University Institute.

The aftermath of an invalid referendum on relocation of asylum seekers: a constitutional amendment in Hungaryby Boldizsar Nagy, Central European University

Le démantèlement du camp de Calais : trop tard ? trop peu ? (2ème partie)  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

Le démantèlement du camp de Calais : trop tard ? trop peu ? (1ère partie)  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

October 2016

‘I Travel, therefore I Am a Suspect’: an overview of the EU PNR Directive – by Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary University of London

Dublin ‘reloaded’ or time for ambitious pragmatism? – by Marcello Di Filippo, Associate Professor of International Law and Coordinator of the Observatory on European Migration Law, University of Pisa (Italy)

September 2016

The Bratislava Declaration on migration: European irresponsibility instead of solidarity – by Phillippe De Bruycker (ULB/EUI) & Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi (Max Weber Fellow, EUI).

Rétablissement des contrôles aux frontières intérieures: Chronique d’une recommandation annoncée ou la flétrissure? – par Nuno Piçarra, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & European University Institute.

July 2016

Chaos in Chios: Legal questions regarding the administrative procedure in the Greek Hotspots – by Catharina Ziebritzki, Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

A New Blue Card Scheme? The Commission’s proposal for highly skilled migration into the EU – by Elspeth Guild, Jean Monnet Professor ad personam, Queen Mary University of London

Brexit : questions de frontières entre l’Union et le Royaume Uni par Henri Labayle, CDRE

June 2016

Brexit : mauvais génies et apprentis sorcierspar Henri Labayle, CDRE

A right to family reunification for persons under international protection? The Strasbourg case-law, state sovereignty and EU harmonisation – by DDr. Philip Czech, Senior Scientist at the Austrian Human Rights Institute, University of Salzburg

Accord politique ou juridique : Quelle est la nature du “machin” conclu entre l’UE et la Turquie en matière d’asile? – par Olivier Corten, Professeur ordinaire à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Directeur du Centre de droit international; et Marianne Dony, Professeur ordinaire à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Chaire Jean Monnet de droit de l’Union européenne

May 2016

In search of a legal basis for the Austrian asylum caps –  by Ulrike Brandl, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Salzburg

Dublin est mort, vive Dublin ! La proposition de réforme du 4 mai 2016 de la Commission européenne –  by Dr. Constantin Hruschka, Professeur invité à l’Université de Bielefeld

Dublin is dead! Long live Dublin! The 4 May 2016 proposal of the European Commission by Dr. Constantin Hruschka, Lecturer at the University of Bielefeld

Downgrading asylum standards to coerce solidarity: Sweden as a case in point by Eleni Karageorgiou, Lund University, Sweden

Detecting foreign fighters: the reinvigoration of the Schengen Information System in the wake of terrorist attacks by Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary, University of London

April 2016

The reception of asylum seekers in Europe: failing common standards by Minos Mouzourakis, European Council on Refugees and Exiles

Family reunification for same-sex couples: a step forward in times of crisis, comments on the Pajić ruling of the ECtHR by Ana Rita Gil, FDNUL/OMNIA, and Susana Almeida, IPL 

Désespérément à la recherche de solidarité : quand la saga de l’asile dans l’Union européenne continue Par Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Eimear O’Neill et David Watt, Réseau Odysseus, projet OMNIA

Desperately searching for solidarity: the EU asylum saga continues by Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Eimear O’Neill and David Watt, Odysseus Network, OMNIA Project Team

The EU-Turkey Agreement on migration and asylum: False pretences or a fool’s bargain? – by Henri Labayle, CDRE, and Philippe de Bruycker, Odysseus Academic Network

March 2016

L’accord Union européenne – Turquie : faux semblant ou marché de dupes ? by Henri Labayle, CDRE, et Philippe de Bruycker, Réseau Académique Odysseus

Why the EU-Turkey Deal Can Be Legal and a Step in the Right Directionby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

La Marche turque : quand l’Union sous-traite le respect de ses valeurs à un État tiersby Henri Labayle, CDRE, et Philippe de Bruycker, Réseau Académique Odysseus

Un mécanisme européen d’aide humanitaire : échec ou manifestation de la solidarité ?by Joanna Pétin, CDRE

The Danish ‘Jewellery Law’: When the signal hits the fan?by Ulla Iben Jensen and Jens Vedsted-Hansen, Aarhus University

February 2016

Brexit : un arrangement, vraiment ? un départ, enfin ?by Henri Labayle, CDRE

Sharing responsibility: A proposal for a European Asylum System based on solidarityby Evelien Brouwer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Conny Rijken, Tilburg University, and Ralph Severijns, Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken (ACVZ)

Collective expulsions in times of migratory crisis: Comments on the Khlaifia case of the ECHRby Ana Rita Gil, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Hotspots and Relocation Schemes: the right therapy for the Common European Asylum System?by Francesco Maiani, University of Lausanne, and the Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute

January 2016

Vers un Plan B : refuser l’entrée des réfugiés à la frontière ?par Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

Moving Towards Plan B: the Rejection of Refugees at the Borderby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

Refugee quotas: allowing EU Member States to choose between physical and financial solidarity by Hillel Rapoport, Paris School of Economics and European University Institute

Who is in charge? The external representation of the EU on dialogues on immigration and asylum with third countriesby Paula Garcia Andrade, Universidad Pontificia Comillas

The Paris terrorist attacks: Failure of the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice?Written in collaboration between the European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) and the Odysseus Academic Network

Attentats terroristes de Paris : une défaillance de l’Espace de liberté, sécurité et justice ? Rédigé par ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network) en collaboration avec le Réseau Académique Odysseus

December 2015

Hungary’s appeal against relocation to the CJEU: upfront attack or rear guard battle? by Kees Groenendijk, Radboud University, and Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

EU-Turkey agreement: solving the EU asylum crisis or creating a new Calais in Bodrum?by Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

November 2015

Detention of asylum seekers: interaction of the directives on Return and Reception Conditions in Bulgariaby Valeria Ilareva, member of the Sofia Bar Association

Migration flows and the reintroduction of internal border controls: assessing necessity and proportionality by Evelien Brouwer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Parallel realities: refugees seeking asylum in Europe and Hungary’s reaction by Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

Réalités parallèles : les demandeurs d’asile en Europe et la réaction hongroisepar Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

October 2015

Criminal sanctions and the Return Directive: the CJEU’s ruling in Celaj clarifies an incestuous relationship – by Marie Garcia, CDRE

Sanction pénale et directive « retour » : quand l’arrêt Celaj clarifie des relations incestueuses par Marie Garcia, CDRE

Beyond Dublin – Merkel’s Vision of EU Asylum Policy – by Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

Au-delà de Dublin – La politique européenne de l’asile selon Merkel – par Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

Donald Tusk to the European Council: an inappropriate invitation? – by Eimear O’Neill, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

Donald Tusk au Conseil européen: une invitation inappropriée?par Eimear O’Neill, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

Angela Merkel au Parlement européen, des paroles aux actes?par Henri Labayle, CDRE

Angela Merkel at the European Parliament: from words to action?by Henri Labayle, CDRE