July 2018

114. Migration management in South America: any Ideas for the European Union? – By Diego Acosta Arcarazo, Reader at the University of Bristol Law School 

113. In search of a safe harbour for the Aquarius: the troubled waters of international and EU law – By Melanie Fink, Post-doctoral researcher, University of Leiden, Kristof Gombeer, PhD researcher at the University of Leiden and Vrije Universiteit Brussels, and Jorrit Rijpma, Associate Professor, University of Leiden

112. Tensions as the EU negotiates the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration – By Elspeth Guild, Professor of Law, and Katharine T. Weatherhead, PhD Candidate, Queen Mary University of London

June 2018

111. Implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement: EU Hotspots and restriction of asylum seekers’ freedom of movement (Part 1)  – By Catharina Ziebritzki, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law and Robert Nestler, Refugee law clinics abroad

May 2018

110. When Greek judges decide whether Turkey is a Safe Third Country without caring too much for EU law – By Angeliki Tsiliou,  former Research and Project Assistant of the Odysseus Academic Network

April 2018

109. Children are entitled to Family Reunification with their Parents C-550/16 A & S Court of Justice of the European Union – By Professor Kees Groenendijk, Radboud University Nijmegen and Professor Elspeth Guild, Queen Mary University of London

108. Joining Schengen – Cutting a Gordian knot for Romania and Bulgaria?   – By Jonas Bornemann, Research Assistant and PhD candidate, Chair of Public, European and International Law, Universität Konstanz 

March 2018

107. Circumventing Non-Refoulement or Fighting “Illegal Migration”?   By Nula Frei, PhD, Senior Researcher, Institute of European Law, University of Fribourg & Constantin Hruschka, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich

106. Beyond the ‘Welcome Culture’: Projects of the New German Government on Migration, Asylum and Integration – By Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz 

February 2018

105. First Perspectives on the Zero Draft for the UN Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration of 5 February 2018 –  By Professor Elspeth Guild, Queen Mary University of London and Dr Tugba Basaran, Centre d’Etudes sur les conflits, la liberté et la sécurité, Paris; visiting scholar Harvard University

104. Taricco, M.A.S ou l’art délicat de la retraite en bon ordre …Par Rostane Mehdi, Professeur à l’ Université d’Aix-Marseille et au Collège d’Europe de Bruges

January 2018

103. A ‘blind spot’ in the migration debate? International responsibility of the EU and its Member States for cooperating with the Libyan coastguard and militia By Achilles Skordas, Professor of International Law, University of Copenhagen

102. Monitoring and Steering through FRONTEX and EASO 2.0: The Rise of a New Model of AFSJ agencies? – By Lilian Tsourdi, Departmental Lecturer in International Human Rights and Refugee Law, University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre

101. Towards ‘Judicial Passivism’ in EU Migration and Asylum Law? Preliminary Thoughts for the Final Plenary Session of the 2018 Odysseus ConferenceBy Iris Goldner Lang,* Jean Monnet Professor of EU Law and Holder of the UNESCO Chair on Free Movement of People, Migration and Inter-Cultural Dialogue, University of Zagreb

100. Conflict and compromise between law and politics in EU migration and asylum policies – By Philippe De Bruycker, ULB & Odysseus Coordinator

99. External Competence and Representation of the EU and its Member States in the Area of Migration and AsylumBy Paula García Andrade, Universidad Pontificia Comillas ICAI-ICADE, Madrid

98. Le rapport du Parlement européen sur la réforme du système Dublin: une proposition audacieuse mais pragmatique? – Par Francesco Maiani, Centre de droit comparé, européen et international (CDCEI), Université de Lausanne et Constantin Hruschka, Institut Max Planck de droit et de politiques sociales, Munich

97. Collective expulsion or not? Individualisation of decision making in migration and asylum lawBy Jean-Yves Carlier, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) and at the Université de Liège; Luc Leboeuf, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology and the University of Antwerp

December 2017

96. To protect or to forget? The Human Right to Leave a Country – By Elspeth Guild, Queen Mary University of London and Radboud University Netherlands

95. The Report of the European Parliament on the reform of the Dublin system: certainly bold, but pragmatic? – By Francesco Maiani , Centre for Comparative, European and International Law (CDCEI), University of Lausanne & Constantin Hruschka, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich

94. Brexit : la fin du commencement ? (suite et fin) – Par Henri Labayle, CDRE

93. Brexit : la fin du commencement ?(1ère partie) – Par Henri Labayle, CDRE

92. CJEU rulings on the Western Balkan route: Exceptional times do not necessarily call for exceptional measures – By Neža Kogovšek Šalamon, Director, The Peace Institute – Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies

November 2017

91. Tell me what you see and I’ll tell you if you’re gay: Analysing the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-473/16, F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal – By Nuno Ferreira, University of Sussex & Denise Venturi, Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna Pisa and KU Leuven

90. The new Italian law on unaccompanied minors: a model for the EU? – By Elena Rozzi, ASGI

89. Refuge ou asile ? La situation de Carles Puigdemont en Belgique au regard du droit de l’Union européenne – Par Henri Labayle, CDRE & Bruno Nascimbene, Université de Milan

October 2017

88. A cold shower for Spain-hot returns from Melilla to Morocco: N.D. and N.T. v Spain ECtHR, 3 October 2017 – By Cristina Gortázar Rotaeche & Nuria Ferré Trad, University P. Comillas (Madrid)

87. La Catalogne et l’Union européenne : une question de légalité   Par Henri Labayle, CDRE

86. The Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding: The baseline of a policy approach aimed at closing all doors to Europe? – By Anja Palm, IAI

September 2017

85. Restricting access to asylum and contempt of courts: Illiberals at work in Hungary – By Boldizsár Nagy, CEU

84. Solidarity is not a value: Provisional relocation of asylum-seekers confirmed by the Court of Justice (6 September 2017, Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovakia and Hungary v Council) – By Henri Labayle, CDRE

83. La solidarité n’est pas une valeur : la validation de la relocalisation temporaire des demandeurs d’asile par la Cour de justice (CJUE, 6 septembre 2017, Slovaquie et Hongrie c. Conseil, C-643/15 et C-647/15) – Par Henri Labayle, CDRE

August 2017

82. Protection et circulation des personnes: le grand chambardement (à propos de 4 ouvrages récents)! Par Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, Équipe de Droit International Européen Comparé (EDIEC)

July 2017

81. Une réforme qui est une révolution: sur le règlement 2017/458 modifiant le Code Frontières Schengen – Par Nuno Piçarra, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & European University Institute.

80. EU Asylum Policies: The Power of Strong Regulating States By Natascha Zaun, postdoctoral researcher at University of Oxford.

June 2017

79. Un coup de parapluie riche de conséquences : l’interdiction réitérée par le juge européen d’un fichage généralisé et indifférencié. Réflexions à propos de l’arrêt de la Cour EDH du 22 juin 2017, Ayçaguer c. France – Par Sylvie Peyrou, Maître de conférences Université de Pau, CDRE Bayonne.

78. Systèmes d’information européens sécurité-immigration : lorsqu’ “interopérabilité” ne rime effectivement pas avec “interconnexion” Par Pierre Berthelet, créateur du site securiteinterieure.fr et chercheur aux Hautes Études Internationales, Université Laval.

77. The Asylum Lottery: Recognition Rates Vary Strongly within Germany – by Gerald Schneider, Professor of International Politics at University of Konstanz, editor of European Union Politics, co-editor of International Interactions and President of the European Political Science Association (2013-2015) & Lisa Riedel, Master’s degree student at University of Konstanz.

76. Crise des réfugiés et valeurs de l’Union; L’Europe après la pluie? – par Simon Labayle, Chercheur, Institut d’Etudes Européennes de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles, Membre de l’équipe OMNIA

May 2017

75. Relocation and its Numbers – Which Role for the Courts? – by Barbara Oomen, Fernand Braudel Fellow, European University Institute & Ricardo Rodrigues de Oliveira, PhD Researcher, European University Institute

March 2017

74. Slovenia: Amendments to the Aliens Act Enable the State to Activate Closure of the Border for Asylum Seekers by Saša Zagorc,  Associate Professor, University of Ljubljana and Neža Kogovšek Šalamon, Director, The Peace Institute – Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies

73. Ill-Treatment Of Migrants In Greek Law Enforcement – Are the Strasbourg Court Judgments the Tip of the Iceberg?by Nikolaos Sitaropoulos, Office of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights

72. Petit à petit la vulnérabilité fait son nid … Quelques réflexions à propos de l’arrêt C.K. du 16 février 2017 – par Joanna Pétin, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

71. EU-Swiss free movement and “stop mass immigration”: Much Ado about Nothing? – by Francesco Maiani, Associate Professor at the University of Lausanne, and Véronique Boillet, Assistant Professor at the University of Lausanne

70. Libre circulation Suisse-UE et « stop à l’immigration de masse » : Much Ado about Nothing ?par Francesco Maiani, Professeur associé à l’Université de Lausanne et Véronique Boillet, Professeure assistante à l’Université de Lausanne

69.  Corrective allocation or effective solidarity? The Slovak Presidency non-paper on the revision of the Dublin system – by Maarten den Heijer, Assistant Professor of International Law, University of Amsterdam

68. Odysseus Annual Conference 2017 “Beyond ‘Crisis’? The State of Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in the EU” – An Overview – by Gabriel Almeida, Katharina Bamberg and James Kneale, OMNIA Coordination Team, Odysseus Network

67. Escale à Canossa ? La protection des droits fondamentaux lors d’un transfert « Dublin » vue par la Cour de justice (C.K. c. Slovénie, C-578/16 PPU) – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

February 2017

66. Le visa humanitaire et la jouissance effective de l’essentiel des droits : une voie moyenne? À propos de l’affaire X. et X par Jean-Yves Carlier et Luc Leboeuf, Université Catholique de Louvain

65. The X. and X. case: Humanitarian visas and the genuine enjoyment of the substance of rights, towards a middle way?by Jean-Yves Carlier and Luc Leboeuf, Université Catholique de Louvain

64. Asylum Visas as an Obligation under EU Law: Case PPU C-638/16 X, X v État Belge (Part II)by Dr Violeta Moreno-Lax, Queen Mary University of London

63. Le non-refoulement comme principe du droit international et le rôle des tribunaux dans sa mise en oeuvre – par Bruno Nascimbene, Université de Milan

62. Asylum Visas as an Obligation under EU Law: Case PPU C-638/16 X, X v État Belge (Part I)by Dr Violeta Moreno-Lax, Queen Mary University of London

61. Terrorisme et droit des réfugiés, des liaisons dangereuses ? Libres propos sur le « Muslim Ban » et la jurisprudence Lounani de la Cour de Justice  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

60. Pitfalls of the Law, Politics and Administrative Practices in the Reform of the Common European Asylum Systemby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

59. Judicial scrutiny of return detention in the Member States: the contribution of national courts to clarifying the concept of ‘risk of absconding’ – by Dr Madalina Bianca Moraru, Centre for Judicial Cooperation, European University Institute

January 2017

58. The EU Migration Partnership Framework: an External Solution to the Crisis? – by Céline Bauloz, Refugee Law Initiative, School of Advanced Study, University of London

57. Hotspots and EU Agencies: Towards an integrated European administration? – by Dr Lilian Tsourdi, European University Institute

56. A Happy New Year for Migration and Asylum Policy? A Critical Review of the Legal and Policy Developments in 2016 in Relation to the Crisis of the European Union – by Philippe de Bruycker, Odysseus Network

December 2016

55. Europe’s asylum policy in crisis: the case of Belgium – by Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen (Flemish Refugee Action)

November 2016

54. The UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants: a mirror of the current EU Migration Policy?by Gabriel Almeida & Katharina Bamberg, OMNIA Coordination Team, Odysseus Network

53. La modification discrète du Code Frontières Schengen par le règlement 2016/1624 relatif au corps européen de garde-frontières: comblement d’une lacune ? – par Nuno Piçarra, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & European University Institute.

52. The aftermath of an invalid referendum on relocation of asylum seekers: a constitutional amendment in Hungaryby Boldizsar Nagy, Central European University

51. Le démantèlement du camp de Calais : trop tard ? trop peu ? (2ème partie)  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

50. Le démantèlement du camp de Calais : trop tard ? trop peu ? (1ère partie)  – par Henri Labayle, Centre de Documentation et de Recherches Européennes (CDRE)

October 2016

49. ‘I Travel, therefore I Am a Suspect’: an overview of the EU PNR Directive – by Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary University of London

48. Dublin ‘reloaded’ or time for ambitious pragmatism? – by Marcello Di Filippo, Associate Professor of International Law and Coordinator of the Observatory on European Migration Law, University of Pisa (Italy)

September 2016

47. The Bratislava Declaration on migration: European irresponsibility instead of solidarity – by Phillippe De Bruycker (ULB/EUI) & Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi (Max Weber Fellow, EUI).

46. Rétablissement des contrôles aux frontières intérieures: Chronique d’une recommandation annoncée ou la flétrissure? – par Nuno Piçarra, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & European University Institute.

July 2016

45. Chaos in Chios: Legal questions regarding the administrative procedure in the Greek Hotspots – by Catharina Ziebritzki, Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

44. A New Blue Card Scheme? The Commission’s proposal for highly skilled migration into the EU – by Elspeth Guild, Jean Monnet Professor ad personam, Queen Mary University of London

43. Brexit : questions de frontières entre l’Union et le Royaume Uni par Henri Labayle, CDRE

June 2016

42. Brexit : mauvais génies et apprentis sorcierspar Henri Labayle, CDRE

41. A right to family reunification for persons under international protection? The Strasbourg case-law, state sovereignty and EU harmonisation – by DDr. Philip Czech, Senior Scientist at the Austrian Human Rights Institute, University of Salzburg

40. Accord politique ou juridique : Quelle est la nature du “machin” conclu entre l’UE et la Turquie en matière d’asile? – par Olivier Corten, Professeur ordinaire à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Directeur du Centre de droit international; et Marianne Dony, Professeur ordinaire à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Chaire Jean Monnet de droit de l’Union européenne

May 2016

39. In search of a legal basis for the Austrian asylum caps –  by Ulrike Brandl, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Salzburg

38. Dublin est mort, vive Dublin ! La proposition de réforme du 4 mai 2016 de la Commission européenne –  by Dr. Constantin Hruschka, Professeur invité à l’Université de Bielefeld

37. Dublin is dead! Long live Dublin! The 4 May 2016 proposal of the European Commission by Dr. Constantin Hruschka, Lecturer at the University of Bielefeld

36. Downgrading asylum standards to coerce solidarity: Sweden as a case in point by Eleni Karageorgiou, Lund University, Sweden

35. Detecting foreign fighters: the reinvigoration of the Schengen Information System in the wake of terrorist attacks by Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary, University of London

April 2016

34. The reception of asylum seekers in Europe: failing common standards by Minos Mouzourakis, European Council on Refugees and Exiles

33. Family reunification for same-sex couples: a step forward in times of crisis, comments on the Pajić ruling of the ECtHR by Ana Rita Gil, FDNUL/OMNIA, and Susana Almeida, IPL 

32. Désespérément à la recherche de solidarité : quand la saga de l’asile dans l’Union européenne continue Par Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Eimear O’Neill et David Watt, Réseau Odysseus, projet OMNIA

31. Desperately searching for solidarity: the EU asylum saga continues by Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Eimear O’Neill and David Watt, Odysseus Network, OMNIA Project Team

30. The EU-Turkey Agreement on migration and asylum: False pretences or a fool’s bargain? – by Henri Labayle, CDRE, and Philippe de Bruycker, Odysseus Academic Network

March 2016

29. L’accord Union européenne – Turquie : faux semblant ou marché de dupes ? by Henri Labayle, CDRE, et Philippe de Bruycker, Réseau Académique Odysseus

28. Why the EU-Turkey Deal Can Be Legal and a Step in the Right Directionby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

27. La Marche turque : quand l’Union sous-traite le respect de ses valeurs à un État tiersby Henri Labayle, CDRE, et Philippe de Bruycker, Réseau Académique Odysseus

26. Un mécanisme européen d’aide humanitaire : échec ou manifestation de la solidarité ?by Joanna Pétin, CDRE

25. The Danish ‘Jewellery Law’: When the signal hits the fan?by Ulla Iben Jensen and Jens Vedsted-Hansen, Aarhus University

February 2016

24. Brexit : un arrangement, vraiment ? un départ, enfin ?by Henri Labayle, CDRE

23. Sharing responsibility: A proposal for a European Asylum System based on solidarityby Evelien Brouwer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Conny Rijken, Tilburg University, and Ralph Severijns, Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken (ACVZ)

22. Collective expulsions in times of migratory crisis: Comments on the Khlaifia case of the ECHRby Ana Rita Gil, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

21. Hotspots and Relocation Schemes: the right therapy for the Common European Asylum System?by Francesco Maiani, University of Lausanne, and the Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute

January 2016

20. Vers un Plan B : refuser l’entrée des réfugiés à la frontière ?par Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

19. Moving Towards Plan B: the Rejection of Refugees at the Borderby Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

18. Refugee quotas: allowing EU Member States to choose between physical and financial solidarity by Hillel Rapoport, Paris School of Economics and European University Institute

17. Who is in charge? The external representation of the EU on dialogues on immigration and asylum with third countriesby Paula Garcia Andrade, Universidad Pontificia Comillas

16. The Paris terrorist attacks: Failure of the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice?Written in collaboration between the European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) and the Odysseus Academic Network

15. Attentats terroristes de Paris : une défaillance de l’Espace de liberté, sécurité et justice ? Rédigé par ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network) en collaboration avec le Réseau Académique Odysseus

December 2015

14. Hungary’s appeal against relocation to the CJEU: upfront attack or rear guard battle? by Kees Groenendijk, Radboud University, and Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

13. EU-Turkey agreement: solving the EU asylum crisis or creating a new Calais in Bodrum?by Jean-Baptiste Farcy, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

November 2015

12. Detention of asylum seekers: interaction of the directives on Return and Reception Conditions in Bulgariaby Valeria Ilareva, member of the Sofia Bar Association

11. Migration flows and the reintroduction of internal border controls: assessing necessity and proportionality by Evelien Brouwer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

10. Parallel realities: refugees seeking asylum in Europe and Hungary’s reaction by Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

9. Réalités parallèles : les demandeurs d’asile en Europe et la réaction hongroisepar Boldizsár Nagy, Central European University

October 2015

8. Criminal sanctions and the Return Directive: the CJEU’s ruling in Celaj clarifies an incestuous relationship – by Marie Garcia, CDRE

7. Sanction pénale et directive « retour » : quand l’arrêt Celaj clarifie des relations incestueuses par Marie Garcia, CDRE

6. Beyond Dublin – Merkel’s Vision of EU Asylum Policy – by Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

5. Au-delà de Dublin – La politique européenne de l’asile selon Merkel – par Daniel Thym, Universität Konstanz

4. Donald Tusk to the European Council: an inappropriate invitation? – by Eimear O’Neill, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

3. Donald Tusk au Conseil européen: une invitation inappropriée?par Eimear O’Neill, Odysseus Network OMNIA Project

2. Angela Merkel au Parlement européen, des paroles aux actes?par Henri Labayle, CDRE

1. Angela Merkel at the European Parliament: from words to action?by Henri Labayle, CDRE